manupatra roundup

Legislative and Regulatory Update

You now have the option of customizing your manupatra round-up .This means that you get updates on the areas of interest that you select .You may change your preferences at any time you wish to. If you do not customize your round up you will continue to get the updates on all areas

 

To customize your round-up now click here.

_____________________________________________________________________

India Centric Online Legal & Business Database

Bringing forth new efficiency and unparalleled results to research efforts.

In This Issue

[No.80]                                                                            March 20, 2004

International
SEBI
Department of Company Affairs
CBEC Excise Tariff
Service Tax
Department of Economic Affairs
RBI
DGFT
Department of Telecommunications
Ministry of Human Resources and Development
Ministry of Labour
Press Information Bureau
Supreme Court
Gist of Cases of Various High Courts and Tribunals

To keep you informed about the latest Legislative and Regulatory information manupatra.com publishes this e-roundup highlighting the recent changes brought about by the Notifications/Acts/Bills /Ordinances etc.

About manupatra.com

../ provides comprehensive and easy to use legal and related information over the Internet .Our database covers Central Laws , Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court (full text of the judgments from 1950 onwards ), Orders of Tribunals , Bills , Notifications, Circulars and more

Key features of manupatra are

Content is derived from reliable primary and secondary sources
Database is updated on a daily basis
Electronic Ready Reckoner to view the judgments under a particular section of an Act / Subject
Powerful search engine with user friendly interfaces
Search in any one court/year or multiple courts/year
Hyper-linking of documents

Updated modules on WTO, Anti Dumping, Arbitration, Investment Destinations Abroad, Capital Markets, Taxation, Environment, Cyber & IT Laws, IPR, Corporate Laws, Industrial Policies, Foreign Trade, Forex & Banking and more

 

 

For subscription to manupatra.com or for more details please log onto ../ or call us at 0120 2531811 or send an email to : contact@manupatra.com

If at any stage you wish to stop receiving the e-roundup please click here to unsubscribe.

 

   

International Legal News

Cases

Source: Westlawinternational.com

  • Criminal Justice: Statutory presumption that cheque is issued with intent to defraud was applicable to defendant who wrote bad cheques on closed accounts.

The statutory presumption that a cheque is issued with intent to defraud when a cheque is drawn on a bank in which the maker or drawer has no account was applicable to a defendant who wrote bad cheques on bank accounts that were closed. The term "no account" included a bank account that had been closed as that term was used in the Virginia statute providing that it shall be presumed that a cheque was issued with intent to defraud when the cheque is drawn on a bank in which the maker or drawer has "no account."

Sykes v. Com.

  • Government: Internal investigation document allegedly used by Secret Service was subject to FOIA exemption.

An internal investigation document sought by a federal prisoner, allegedly used by the Secret Service to analyze and profile factual information concerning individuals "having a direction of interest toward a Secret Service protectee," was subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exemption for documents related to an agency's internal personnel rules and practices. The document could be used to gain insight into the methods and criteria utilized to identify and investigate persons of interest, and could alter such individuals' behavior to avoid detection.

Dorsett v. U.S. Dept. of Treasury

  • Criminal Justice: State was required to show cause why it should not bear cost of federal habeas review in capital case.

The state of Virginia, which by statute precluded post-conviction review of a state prisoner's claims that he was mentally retarded and that he was incompetent to be executed, would be required to show cause why it should not bear the cost and expenses of the prisoner's federal habeas proceedings in which he raised for plenary review the claims that were barred in state court. These costs would include but not be limited to reimbursement for the court's appointed expert. The proper balance and distribution of authority in a federal system is not a trivial matter or a matter of passing importance. The structure of government, like the Bill of Rights, establishes limitations on the exercise the power. This balance requires, however, the states to apply the United States Constitution no matter how inconvenient it might be. Here, Virginia precluded post-conviction review of two viable, fundamentally important and basic constitutional questions forcing plenary review by a federal habeas court. Under the circumstances, it was appropriate to require the state to show cause why it should not bear the cost and expense of the federal proceedings.

Walton v. Johnson

  • Criminal Justice: O.J. Simpson murder trial publicity did not deprive defendant in unrelated drug case of impartial jury.

Publicity surrounding the O.J. Simpson murder trial, in which the verdict was announced two days before the jury in a drug trafficking conspiracy prosecution in Connecticut found the defendant guilty, did not deprive the defendant in the drug case of an impartial jury. The defendant in the drug case maintained, on his motion to vacate his conviction and sentence, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at his trial because his attorney did not request that the court question the white jurors as to their feelings about blacks following the Simpson trial. He asserted that the Simpson verdict created a high potential for unconscious racism which would likely have an effect on the jury's deliberations. However, the media coverage of the Simpson trial had nothing to do with the issues in the defendant's drug case, let alone his guilt or innocence. This defendant was convicted of possession with intent to sell narcotics, a charge completely unrelated to the murder charges in the Simpson trial. The post conviction relief court was therefore satisfied that the jurors retained the requisite impartiality despite the verdict announced in the Simpson trial.

Johnson v. U.S.

  • Family Law: Award of $15,492 per month in interim support to wife in divorce proceedings was not unreasonable.

An award of $15,492 per month in interim support to the wife in divorce proceedings was not unreasonable in light of the wife's need for support and the husband's ability to pay, notwithstanding that the wife's final order for support was only $3,638 per month. The husband was a physician who had earned a substantial six-figure income prior to his ankle injury, he stated he would voluntarily stop performing surgeries in order to allow their house to go into foreclosure, and he made significant charitable contributions during the pendency of the divorce, which indicated that his partial disability from his ankle problems did not diminish his earing capacity to the degree he claimed. The superior court also made sufficient factual findings regarding the wife's needs.

Beal v. Beal

  • Health: Physician employed in same medical practice as patient's medical expert could testify on behalf of surgeon.

Absent evidence of an actual exchange of confidential information, no conflict existed to disqualify a physician employed in the same medical practice as a patient's medical expert from testifying on behalf of the defendant surgeon without the patient's consent. The court was required to determine whether the patient, who sought to exclude the witness, produced evidence that any substantive information about the case had been exchanged between the affiliated experts. This was a matter of first impression.

Wright v. Kaye

  • Health: Immunity for crimes that offender admitted committing did not apply to Sexually Violent Persons Act proceedings.

Sex crimes that a sex offender admitted having committed, in return for a promise that he would not be prosecuted for them, could form the basis for an expert's opinion that the offender might be a sexually violent person within the meaning of the Sexually Violent Persons (SVP) Act. Although the offender could not be prosecuted criminally for any offenses to which he confessed in return for the promise of immunity, proceedings under the SVP Act were not criminal prosecutions but civil commitment proceedings whose aim was not to punish but to provide sex offender treatment while simultaneously protecting the public.

In re Commitment of Conn

  • International Law: Airline passengers could not recover for mental injuries not caused by bodily injury.

Passengers aboard an aircraft which suffered an accident while landing could not recover from the airline, under the Warsaw Convention, for their alleged mental injuries, since those injuries were not caused by any bodily injury. The Court's interpretation of Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention, which found that airline liability for mental injuries of passengers was limited to those cases in which the mental injuries resulted from a bodily injury, was supported by the decisions of other American courts, interpretations of French law, the negotiation history of the Convention, the purpose of the Convention, and the judicial decisions of other signatory countries.

Ehrlich v. American Airlines, Inc.

  • Transportation: Motorist's medical bills were relevant to prove pain and suffering, even though bills were discharged in bankruptcy.

A motorist's medical bills were relevant to prove the non-monetary elements of a compensatory damages claim, such as pain and suffering, and to establish the inconvenience that the motorist experienced because of a driver's negligence, even though those bills had been discharged in bankruptcy. The bills tended to establish the probability of the motorist's claim that she experienced pain and suffering as a result of the automobile accident. Excluding this relevant evidence was reversible error, since the jury could have viewed such evidence as persuasive and objective corroboration of the motorist's subjective complaints. This was a matter of first impression.

Barkley v. Wallace

News

  • Oregon Atorney General Says "Gay Marriage Illegal"

Oregon's attorney general advised county officials that issuing same-sex marriage licenses is against state law but added that the law in question may be unconstitutional. In this wake, officials have been urged in Multnomah County to stop issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples until the state Supreme Court can decide whether laws limiting matrimony to heterosexuals pass constitutional muster. The legality of more than 1,000 licenses already issued to same-sex couples by Multnomah County remains in question which will ultimately be determined by what the Supreme Court decides.

  • Life Imprisonment For Man Convicted Of Raping Infant

A jury has convicted a man of raping a 9-month-old girl and leaving her for dead in the woods rejecting the accused person, Randolph Standifer's insanity defense and found him guilty of kidnapping, sexual battery of a child younger than 12 and attempted murder in the second degree. Standifer, 23, will be sentenced to life in prison, the only penalty allowed by law when a child younger than 12 is raped. Although jurors believe Standifer was mentally ill, but they also took into consideration that he knew it was wrong, because he covered it up.

  • Internet Wiretaps Requires New Rules

The Justice Department has said that technology companies should be required to ensure that law enforcement agencies can install wiretaps on Internet traffic and new generations of digital communications. The push would effectively expand the scope of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, a 1994 law that requires the telecommunications industry to build into its products tools that U.S. investigators can use to eavesdrop on conversations with a court order.

  • UK Judge Barred In Sierra Leone Court

In a recent ruling, the Court has said that the President of Sierra Leone's UN-backed war crimes court will not sit in trials of three rebel leaders charged with atrocities. The decision was based on claims that Geoffrey Robertson, a senior British lawyer, was biased. Mr Robertson accused the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) of brutal acts in a book he wrote before his appointment. The decision was taken after lawyers for the three RUF commanders filed an application for the removal of Mr Robertson on the grounds of his alleged bias.

  • Public Smoking 'Banned' In Uganda

Uganda has imposed a smoking ban in all public places. Smoking in restaurants, educational institutions and bars would now be an offence and offenders will be fined between $10 and $50 if arrested by policemen who have been instructed to enforce the law. However, since ban has not been gazetted so it remains unclear quite how rigorously it will be enforced. The decision is bound to raise concern among tobacco farmers in North-West Uganda.

  • China Endorses Private Property

China's parliament has agreed landmark changes to the constitution that will protect private property for the first time since the 1949 revolution. With this vote which is to amend the 1982 constitution, China is abandoning one of the key pillars of communism. Entrepreneurs and businessmen had lobbied for the constitution to enshrine the protection of private property. The amendment is expected to help stop state officials from requisitioning property and private possessions and also see the words "martial law" removed from the document and replaced with "state of emergency".

  • Media Baron To Fight Court Ruling

Media baron Conrad Black is to fight a US court ruling that blocked a deal he struck to sell the UK's Daily Telegraph newspaper and other titles. Lord Black, who is engaged in a long running legal battle with the Hollinger, wants to sell his controlling share in Hollinger International to Scottish twins Frederick and David Barclay. Black resigned as chief executive of Hollinger International in November last after an internal inquiry revealed he received millions of dollars in disputed payments.

  • Death Sentence Commuted By Texas Governor

Gov. Rick Perry has commuted the death sentence of a Houston killer with an IQ estimated at 63, a level 7 degrees below of a retarded person. The move is in consonance with a 2002 Supreme Court decision barring the execution of retarded inmates. It was the first time Perry, a Republican who has presided over 81 executions since taking office in 2000, has commuted a death sentence. The killer will serve a life sentence for the 1990 murder of James Michael Wilcox, a transient living out of his truck, who was shot to death after crossing paths with the killer and an accomplice as they fled a clothing-store robbery.

  • Judge Not To Order New Exxon Mobil Trial

A judge refused to order a new trial over a $11.9 billion verdict Alabama won against Exxon Mobil, and scolded the oil company for not providing a document she considered vital to the case. She also refused to override the verdict, returned by Montgomery Jury, to rule in Exxon's favor. The jury had decided that Exxon Mobil cheated the state out of royalties due from natural gas wells drilled in state-owned waters around Mobile Bay, and it awarded $63.6 million in compensatory damages and $11.8 billion in punitive damages. All that's left for her to decide, she said, is whether to reduce or uphold $11.8 billion the jury awarded in punitive damages.

  • Mother Charged With Murdering Fetus

Authorities charged 28-year-old Rowland with murder saying she exhibited "depraved indifference to human life," according to court documents. Doctors said, Rowland was repeatedly told by them that her unborn twins would likely die if she did not have a Caesarean section but she refused and later had stillborn. The case could affect abortion rights and open the door to the prosecution of mothers who smoke or don't follow their obstetrician's diet.

  • NYSE Barred From Blockades, Searches

A Manhattan judge ordered the New York Stock Exchange to remove security blockades and end vehicle searches on the streets around its building further stating that only the Police Department is authorized to close streets and therefore the NYSE's actions were "unlawful." The judge said he also questioned whether the police could delegate that authority. The Judge said if the city wants to delegate authority to the NYSE to establish a secure zone around the stock exchange, it should comply with applicable law.

SEBI

Secondary Market Division

  • Trading by FIIs and NRIs in Exchange Traded Interest Rate Derivative Contracts

Circular No. SEBI/DNPD/Cir-21/2004/03/09 Dated 09.03.2004 : The SEBI Advisory Committee on Derivatives and Market Risk Management (RMG), in its meeting held on June 26, 2003, recommended FII position limits for exchange traded interest rate derivative contracts. The SEBI Board, in its meeting held on July 24, 2003, approved the recommendations of the RMG and mandated that these measures could be implemented by SEBI at an appropriate time. RBI also permitted the FIIs to participate in exchange traded interest rate derivative contracts and specified position limits for FII transactions in exchange traded interest rate derivatives. Further, RBI has specified that FIIs & NRIs may trade in all exchange traded derivative contracts approved by SEBI from time to time subject to the limits prescribed by SEBI. Accordingly the position limits for FIIs, their sub-accounts and NRIs in exchange traded interest rate derivative contracts has been prescribed by the SEBI.

  • Amendment to Periodical Report

Circular No. MIRSD/DPS-2/DT/Cir-02/2004 Dated 09.03.2004 : SEBI has decided that Debenture Trustees would be allowed to associate with privately placed unlisted debt issues. The debenture trustees would be responsible for such issues and are accountable. It is considered necessary to monitor the exposure of SEBI registered debenture trustees in such unlisted debt issues. Accordingly, it has been decided to elicit relevant additional information in this regard in the periodical report submitted by debenture trustees.

In view of the above decision, SEBI Circular No. 2(1999-2000) dated April 19, 1999 has been partially amended and certain additional information, in tabular form, viz. Name of the Issuer, Issue Size, Secured / Unsecured, Date of allotment & No. of allottees of the security has been incorporated as the last item in the report.

Department of Company Affairs

  • Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Amendment Rules, 2004

Notification No. GSR189(E) Dated 12.03.2004 : In rule 2 of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975, in clause (b), which defines the term "deposit", for sub-clause (ix), the following sub-clause has been substituted, namely:-

" (ix) any amount received from a person who, at the time of the receipt of the amount, was a director of the company or any amount received from a relative of a director or its member by a private company :

Provided that the director, relative of a director or member, as the case may be, from whom money is received, furnishes to the company at the time of giving the money, a declaration in writing to the effect that the amount is not being given out of funds acquired by him by borrowing or accepting from others."

CBEC Excise Tariff

  • Excisability of Sugar Syrup

Circular No. 780/13/2004/CX Dated 12.03.2004 : To determine the excisability of the Sugar Syrup, the attention was diverted to a ruling of Hon'ble Supreme Court in which it was laid that for determining the excsiability of a product, the 'test of marketability' is the relevant criterion. On consideration of this it has been clarified that if the sugar syrup is marketable as such, without any reference to percentage of sugar concentration, then the same is excisable when taken for captive consumption or removed as such.

  • Clarification Regarding Payment of Cess Twice on the Same Tea

Circular No. 777/10/2004-CX Dated 03.03.2004 : Ministry of Commerce and Industry through its amending notification vide No. 1086(E) dated 11.11.99 had exempted all teas from the payment of cess on which cess has already been paid at an earlier stage. Therefore it has been clarified that collection of duty of cess may be regulation after taking into consideration the clarification provided by the notification issued by ministry of Commerce and Industry.

Service Tax
  • Clarification on Ambiguity in the Provisions of Rule 3(5) of the Service Tax Credit Rules, 2002

Circular No. 77/7/2004 Dated 10.03.2004 : On the ambiguity in the provisions of Rule 3(5) of the Service Tax Credit Rules, 2002, which reads that, "in case the service provider, opts not to maintain separate accounts of input service meant for consumption in relation to rendering of such output service which are chargeable to service tax as well as exempted services or non-taxable services, he shall be allowed to utilize service tax credit for payment of service tax on any output service only to the extent of an amount not exceeding thirty five percent of the amount of service tax payable on such output service", it has been clarified that input service tax credit can be utilized only to the extent of 35% of the total service tax payable on all the taxable output services.

Department of Economic Affairs

  • Securities Appellate Tribunal (Salaries, Allowance and other Terms and Conditions of Presiding Officer and Other Members) Rules, 2003

Notification No. GSR178(E) Dated 09.03.2004 : The Central Government has framed & issued the Securities Appellate Tribunal (Salaries, Allowance and other Terms and Conditions of Presiding Officer and Other Members) Rules, 2003. These rules has been brought into force from 09.03.2004. The rules describe the provisions regarding Terms and conditions of Service, Salary, Pension and Provident Fund, Travelling Allowance and other facilities to the Presiding officer & other members of the Securities Appellate Tribunal.

RBI

  • Exim Bank's Line of Credit of USD 10 Million to Central Bank of Djibouti

Circular No. A.P.(DIR Series) Circular No. 79 Dated 15.03.2004 : Exim Bank has concluded an agreement with Central Bank of Djibouti, Djibouti on July 24, 2003 making available to the latter, a Line of Credit (LOC) upto an aggregate sum of USD 10 Million. The Credit Agreement has become effective from January 14, 2004 and is available for financing export from India of Category 'A' and Category 'B' goods and services as per Memorandum PEM and any other item including raw materials and commodities that may be agreed upon between Exim Bank and Central Bank of Djibouti to buyers in Djibouti. Accordingly, no agency commission shall be payable in respect of exports financed under the above LOC, Reserve Bank may consider, on merit, requests for payment of commission up to a maximum extent of 5 per cent of the f.o.b./c&f/c.i.f. value in respect of goods exported and which require after sales service. In such cases, commission will have to be paid in Djibouti only by deduction from the invoice of the relevant shipment. The reimbursable amount by the Exim Bank to the negotiating bank will be 90 per cent of the f.o.b./c&f/c.i.f. value minus the commission paid. Approval for the payment of commission should be obtained from the Reserve Bank before the relevant shipment is effected.

  • Withdrawal of Foreign Inward Remittance Payment System (FIRPS) Instrument

Circular No. A.P.(DIR Series) Circular No. 78 Dated 13.03.2004 : The relevance of the FIRP system has been reviewed in consultation with FEDAI and it has been decided to withdraw the FIRPS instrument as it is no longer used by banks in the wake of electronic credits and online transfer of funds.

  • Prudential Guidelines on Investment in Non-Government Securities

Notification No. IDMD.PDRS.No. 03 /03.64.00/2003-04 Dated 08.03.2004 : In order to contain the risks arising out of investment in non-Government securities by the Primary Dealers (PDs), the investment guidelines have been finalized in consultation with the Primary Dealers Association of India (PDAI). These guidelines come into force with immediate effect i.e. from 08.03.2004.

  • Credit Mobilisation Target under Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) during the Year 2004-05

Notification No. RPCD. SP.BC.No 70/09.01.01/2003-04 Dated 16.03.2004 : Government of India have finalised the credit mobilisation target for the year 2004-05 under SGSY. However, if needed, the States/UTs in consultation with their respective State Level Banker's Committee/DCC may enhance the targets, as may deem necessary.

  • Master Circular-Interest Rates on Rupee Deposits

Notification No. UBD.BPD.MC.No.9/13.01.00/2003-04 Dated 16.03.2004 : The RBI has been issuing various instructions on the matter of "Interest Rates on Rupee Deposits' from time to time. In order to enable the primary (urban) co-operative banks to have all the currently operative instructions on the subject at once place, a Master Circular has been prepared and the same has been issued by the RBI.

  • Introduction of ECS (Credit) for Refunds of Income Tax

Notification No. DGBA.GAD. No.H-767/42.01.034/2003-04 Dated 09.03.2004 : In view of the difficulties faced by the banks as well as the public at large in regard to ITROs, RBI has been pursuing with the Central Government for alternative system for tax refunds and now Government has since taken a decision to implement ECS credit for direct tax refunds. A notification in this regard is expected to be issued by the Government shortly.

DGFT

  • Clarification on Issues Related to Duty Free Entitlement Certificate for Service Providers

Circular No. 29 (RE-2003)/2002-2007 Dated 09.03.2004 : The matter of import of consumables, office equipments and professional equipments under Duty Free Entitlement Certificate Scheme and other relevant issues has been discussed and the following issues have been clarified related to the Duty Free Entitlement Certificate for service providers:-

i) Import of consumables other than milk and dairy products, vegetable, horticulture and agriculture products would be permitted under the scheme. However, beverages, spirits and vinegar covered under Chapter 22 of ITC(HS) Classification or seafood items ( both processed and semi processed) are permitted to be imported.

ii) The scheme will not be available for 100% EOUs and units operating under SEZ, STPI and EHTP Schemes.

iii) Payment received from export earners foreign currency (EEFC) account will not be counted for the scheme.

iv) Goods allowed to be imported under this scheme shall have nexus with the services rendered.

v) Policy Circular No.4 dated 14th May, 2003 stands withdrawn.

Department of Telecommunications
  • Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services Tariff (First Amendment) Order, 2004

Notification No. 301-3/2004-Eco Dated 10.03.2004 : The amendment has been by substitution of Clause 2 of Section II, of The Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services Tariff Order, 2004, which relates to Tariff. The substituting clause read as under :

"(a) Cable subscribers to cable operator;

(b) Cable operators to Multi Service Operators/Broadcasters (including their authorised distribution agencies); and

(c) Multi Service Operators to Broadcasters (including their authorised distribution agencies)

prevalent as on 26th December 2003 shall be the ceiling until final determination by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India on the various issues concerning these charges."

Ministry of Human Resources and Development 
  • UGC (Returns of Information by University Grants Commission) Rules, 2004

Notification No. GSR184(E) Dated 10.03.2004 : The Central Government has made the UGC (Returns of Information by University Grants Commission) Rules, 2004. the rules has been made effective from 10.03.2004. The rules require the UGC to file returns containing information about universities defined under section 2 (f) of the UGC Act. These returns to be furnished by UGC on or before 31st January & 31st July every year.

  • UGC (Inspection of Universities) Rules, 2004

Notification No. GSR183(E) Dated 10.03.2004 : The Central Government has made the rules namely University Grants Commission (Inspection of Universities) Rules, 2004 which have been in force from 10.03.2004. The rules empowers the UGC to appoint a committee to examine and report on the financial needs of a University or its standards of teaching, examination and research or both. The rules also set out the procedure of inspection of universities to be carried out UGC.

  • UGC (Returns of Information by Universities) Rules, 2004

Notification No. GSR182(E) Dated 10.03.2004 : The Central Government has framed & issued the University Grants Commission (Returns of Information by Universities) Rules, 2004 and made them effective from 10.03.2004. The rules make mandatory for every university, on or before the date specified by the University Grants commission every year in this behalf, to furnish the various returns and information to the Commission.

Ministry of Labour
  • Employees Provident Funds (Amendment) Scheme, 2004

Notification No. SO304(E) Dated 04.03.2004 : Amendment has been made in the Employees Provident Fund Scheme, 1952. According to amendment an option to the member of the scheme has been provided to withdraw upto 90 per cent of the amount standing at his credit at any time after attaining the age of 55 years. But the amount so withdrawn should be transferred to the Life Insurance Corporation of India for investment in Varishtha Pension Bima Yojana.

The amendment has been brought into effect from 04.03.2004 and by insertion of paragraph 68NNN after paragraph 68NN of the scheme. the newly inserted paragraph read as under:

"68NNN. Option for withdrawal at the age of 55 years for investment in Varishtha Pension Bima Yojana--

The Commissioner, or where so authorized by the Commissioner, any officer subordinate to him, may, on an application from a member in such form as may be prescribed, permit withdrawal of upto 90 per cent of the amount standing at his credit at any time after attaining the age of 55 years by the member, to be transferred to the Life Insurance Corporation of India for investment in Varishtha Pension Bima Yojana."

  • Employees State Insurance (Central) (2nd Amendment) Rules, 2003

Notification No. GSR172(E) Dated 04.03.2004 : Amendments have been made in the Employees' State Insurance (Central) Rules, 1950. According to the amendments:

(i) in rule 50, the wage limit for coverage of an employee under Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 has been increased from six thousand and five hundred rupees a month to 'seven thousand and five hundred a month.

(ii) in rule 52, Exemption limit, which is taken as the average daily wages during a wage period, for payment of employees' contribution has been enhanced from rupees forty to ruppes fifty.

(iii) in rule 54, the standard benefit rate to the group of employees has been amended.

Press Information Bureau
  • NPPA Revises Prices Of 97 Formulation Packs

Dated 09.03.2004 : The National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority has revised / fixed the prices of 97 formulation packs as on 4th March, 2004. Out of these, the Ceiling Prices in respect of 77 formulation packs have been fixed under DPCO, 1995 based on Glipizide three packs vide S.O. No. 291(E), Spironolactone three packs vide S.O. No. 292(E), Carbamazepine sixteen packs vide S.O. No. 293(E) & 294(E), Doxycycline thirty eight packs vide S.O. No. 295(E), 296(E), 297(E), 298(E) & 299(E) and Vitamins based formulations seventeen packs vide S.O. No. 300(E), 301(E), 302(E) & 303(E), dated 4th March, 2004. The prices of 20 Non-Ceiling Packs based on the bulk drug Insulin, Vitamins, Combination of Cefotaxine Sodium and Sulbactum Sodium, Aspirin and PCMX have also been fixed by the NPPA. While fixing these prices, NPPA has also considered the additional packing material cost towards hologram labeling / ROPP Caps for prevention of spurious drugs.

Supreme Court
  • Commissioner of Police and Ors. and Acharya Jagadishwarananda Avadhuta and Anr.

The issue before the Hon'ble Apex Court was whether taking out Tandav dance in public carrying skull, knife, live snake, trident etc. is an essential part of Ananda Margi faith. Apex Court came to the conclusion that Tandav dance in public is not an essential part of religious rite of Ananda Margi faith and they cannot perform Tandav dance carrying weapons and human skull in public places and that police could impose restrictions on such procession.

A three-judge Bench, by a majority of two to one, held that ‘the test to determine whether a part or practice is essential to the religion is to find out whether the nature of religion will be changed without that part or practice. If taking away of that part or practice could result in a fundamental change in the character of that religion or in its belief, then such part could be treated as an essential or integral part.’ The bench agreed with the 1983 judgment of the Apex Court that had decided that Tandava dance in public is not an essential part of the religious rites of Anand Margi faith. This was primarily based on the fact that “the order itself is of recent origin and the practice of dance is still more recent. (The Anand Marg order was founded in 1955 but Tandav was introduced s a religious rite in and around 1966).

However, the minority judgment said that the Ananda Margi is a religious denomination and as such entitled to the protection under Article 25 and 26(b) of the Constitution for their beliefs and practices including Tandava dance in a procession or public place. Ananda Margis have right to take a procession in public places after obtaining necessary permissions from the concerned authorities and they are also entitled to carry Trishul or Trident, conch or skull so long as such procession is peaceful and does not offend the religious sentiments of other people who equally enjoy fundamental right to exercise their religion freedom.