manupatra roundup

Legislative and Regulatory Update

You now have the option of customizing your manupatra round-up .This means that you get updates on the areas of interest that you select .You may change your preferences at any time you wish to. If you do not customize your round up you will continue to get the updates on all areas

 

To customize your round-up now click here.

_____________________________________________________________________

India Centric Online Legal & Business Database

Bringing forth new efficiency and unparalleled results to research efforts.

In This Issue

[No.85]                                                                            May 10, 2004

International
SEBI
CBEC Excise Tariff
CBEC Customs non Tariff
RBI
DGFT
Department of Commerce
Department of Information  Technology
Press Information Bureau
Supreme Court
High Courts

To keep you informed about the latest Legislative and Regulatory information manupatra.com publishes this e-roundup highlighting the recent changes brought about by the Notifications/Acts/Bills /Ordinances etc.

About manupatra.com

../ provides comprehensive and easy to use legal and related information over the Internet .Our database covers Central Laws , Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court (full text of the judgments from 1950 onwards ), Orders of Tribunals , Bills , Notifications, Circulars and more

Key features of manupatra are

Content is derived from reliable primary and secondary sources
Database is updated on a daily basis
Electronic Ready Reckoner to view the judgments under a particular section of an Act / Subject
Powerful search engine with user friendly interfaces
Search in any one court/year or multiple courts/year
Hyper-linking of documents

Updated modules on WTO, Anti Dumping, Arbitration, Investment Destinations Abroad, Capital Markets, Taxation, Environment, Cyber & IT Laws, IPR, Corporate Laws, Industrial Policies, Foreign Trade, Forex & Banking and more

 

 

For subscription to manupatra.com or for more details please log onto ../ or call us at 0120 2531811 or send an email to : contact@manupatra.com

If at any stage you wish to stop receiving the e-roundup please click here to unsubscribe.

 

   

International Legal News

Cases

Source: Westlawinternational.com

  • Criminal Justice: Federal court lacked jurisdiction over crime committed in government housing facility in Germany.

A federal District Court dismissed a criminal prosecution against an Air Force employee who was accused of sexually abusing a minor while he was visiting a U.S. Government housing facility located off the premises of Ramstein Air Force Base in Germany, because that housing facility was not part of the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the U.S. The German government had never granted either exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction over the facility to the U.S.

U.S. v. Morton

  • Litigation: A writ of mandamus was inappropriate means to challenge dismissal for forum non conveniens.

The Supreme Court overruled its prior cases holding that writ relief was the proper method to challenge dismissal of an action for forum non conveniens. The court held that dismissal was a final judgment, appeal from that final judgment provided an adequate remedy at law, and as such, writ relief was not available.

Pan v. The Eight Judicial Dist. Court of State

  • Government: Term-limit law for state legislators was unconstitutional.

The term-limit law that was adopted by ballot initiative violated the unambiguous and exclusive provisions of the Wyoming (U.S.A.) Constitution providing eligibility requirements for membership in the state legislature. A constitutional amendment was required to alter the eligibility requirements for the legislature.

Cathcart v. Meyer

  • International Law: Lack of statehood barred sovereign immunity for Palestinian organizations.

Palestine was not a "state," precluding claims by the Palestinian Authority (PA) and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) that they had sovereign immunity, as instrumentalities of a foreign state, from a suit seeking damages for the killing of an American citizen and his wife while they were traveling in Israel. At most Palestine was an "amorphous entity" with statehood aspirations.

Estates of Ungar v. Palestinian Authority

  • Litigation: Successor corporation did not waive attorney-client privilege of merged client corporation.

The successor corporation became the holder of the attorney-client privilege of the merged client corporation with respect to the attorney's premerger advice to the predecessor corporation, where the predecessor corporation disappeared as a result of the merger. Since the successor corporation did not waive the privilege, the attorney could not answer deposition questions without violating the attorney-client privilege.

Venture Law Group v. Superior Court

  • Social Security: Foster children for whom State was representative payee of benefits were not denied equal protection.

Foster children receiving Social Security benefits that were paid to the State as representative payee were not denied equal protection, despite the contention that private representative payees had discretion to conserve Social Security benefits for the future use of the child, rather than spend the entirety on the child's costs of care. All representative payees were required to spend the money in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations, which required that the money be used in the best interest of the child. A private payee who did not spend the money on the child's care could be found not to be using the money in the child's best interest, and could be removed by the Social Security Commissioner. Moreover, the State had discretion to conserve a portion of the child's benefits, just as did a private payee. There was no distinction between children with private payees and children for whom the State was payee and, thus, there was no equal protection violation.

Guardianship Estate of Keffeler v. State

  • E-commerce: Computer pornography statute was constitutional.

The Florida computer pornography statute making it unlawful for any person to knowingly utilize a computer on-line service to seduce a child to commit any illegal act relating to sexual battery was constitutional. The statute was not overbroad or vague. Furthermore, the statute did not violate the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution. The State had a compelling interest in protecting minors from being seduced to perform sexual acts, and no legitimate commerce was burdened by penalizing the transmission of harmful sexual material to known minors in order to seduce them.

Cashatt v. State

  • Government: A tax abatement could be challenged by a taxpayer as an expenditure of public funds.

A taxpayer could challenge a tax abatement granted to a hospital for construction of a new facility, provided the taxpayer could show a probable net increase in his taxes as a result of the abatement. The abatement was the equivalent of an expenditure of public funds for which taxpayer action had been previously recognized.

Henson v. HealthSouth Medical Center, Inc.

  • Judicial Administration: Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice's violations of Canons of Judicial Ethics warranted removal from office.

The special Supreme Court of Alabama, appointed by the Governor, has held that the Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice's violations of the Alabama Canons of Judicial Ethics warranted his removal from office. The violations occurred when the Chief Justice willfully refused to obey a lawful and binding order of a United States District Court requiring him to remove a monument engraved with the Ten Commandments which he had placed in the Alabama State Judicial Building.

Moore v. Judicial Inquiry Com'n

  • Labor and Employment: Tina Conner does not have sexual harassment claim against former Governor of Kentucky.

Tina Conner, a woman who had a sexual relationship with Governor Patton of Kentucky, did not have a sexual harassment claim against the Governor or the Commonwealth. There was no evidence that Conner was denied access to housing, insurance, financial services, public accommodations or government-supported facilities, and she did not have an employment relationship with either the Governor or the Commonwealth. Conner's claim that the Governor and the Commonwealth retaliated against her when she called off her relationship with the Governor by not issuing nursing home licenses also failed, as there was no evidence that she individually was a potential licensee who suffered discrimination.

Conner v. Patton

  • Torts: Mental anguish damages were not recoverable in action for loss of pet dog.

A dog-owner was not entitled to recover damages for mental anguish or emotional harm in her action against a pet store based on the loss of a pet dog, absent evidence of the pet store's ill-will, animus or desire to harm her personally. The case arose when the dog was killed in traffic after escaping from a pet groomer employed by the pet store. The dog-owner's claims for counseling costs, intrinsic value, lost wages and exemplary damages were also not recognized.

Petco Animal Supplies, Inc. v. Schuster

News

  • 1955 Murder Probe reopened by U.S. In Civil Rights Case

Nearly after half a century when Emmett Till's mutilated body was found in a Mississippi river, the U.S. Justice Department reopened an investigation into the murder of the black teenager whose death helped spark the civil rights movement. FBI agents and other personnel have been directed to assist local authorities in Mississippi in investigating the 1955 murder, which horrified the country and added fuel to the civil rights movement.

  • Citigroup Settles WorldCom Suit

Citigroup Inc. <C.N> said it would pay $2.65 billion to investors in WorldCom Inc. who had accused it of participating in financial fraud, and has also set aside billions more for other lawsuits in order to put the financial scandals of the late 1990s market behind it.

  • Judge Upset On Grenade Defendant's Dozing

An Army sergeant accused in a deadly grenade attack on his fellow soldiers fell asleep twice during a pretrial hearing, causing an annoyed military judge to order defense attorneys to deal with the man's sleep disorder. It is the first time since the Vietnam War that a U.S. Army soldier has been prosecuted for the murder or attempted murder of another soldier during wartime. Defendant's attorneys argued that the judge should order the government to provide treatment to their client for sleep apnea, a condition that causes periodically stoppage of breathing while asleep and can often make people drowsy in a quiet or monotonous environment.

  • Safety Proposal May Lead To Side Air Bags

The federal regulators plan to take a major step toward protecting passengers in side-impact crashes, which are responsible for 10,000 deaths each year on the nation's highways. It is for the first time since 1990, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is expected to propose a new set of safety standards that vehicles will have to meet in side-impact crashes. The rules are expected to result in the installation of side air bags in all vehicles, since vehicles won't be able to meet the standards without them.

  • Date Set In PeopleSoft Suit Vs. Oracle Case

November 1st has been set as the trial date for PeopleSoft Inc.'s <PSFT.O> lawsuit against Oracle Corp. <ORCL.O> for unfair business practices related to its $9.4 billion hostile takeover bid. Oracle launched its bid for PeopleSoft in June 2003. PeopleSoft then sued its rival business software maker, claiming Oracle's bid was aimed at undermining its business. PeopleSoft is seeking undisclosed financial damages.

  • EPA Regulations Aiming To Cut Pollution From Equipment

The Environmental Protection Agency in Washington announced regulations aimed at cutting pollution from diesel-powered farming and construction equipment and other off-road machinery by more than 90 percent over the next six years. The regulation which is yet to be formally signed requires refiners to nearly eliminate sulfur in diesel fuel used in construction, farming and other off-road activities by 2010 and for use in large ships and locomotives by 2012.

  • Pension Reforms Approved By Japan

Japan's lower house of parliament has voted in favour of reforming the pension system, which is under strain due to the country's ageing population. The proposal involves the public making higher payments for lower benefits. The reform plans have been overshadowed in recent weeks by the news that a number of senior politicians have not been paying into the pensions system.

  • Arrest Warrant Issued For Jakarta General

An arrest warrant has been issued by a UN-backed tribunal in East Timor for one of Indonesia's main presidential candidates, General Wiranto. The former military chief has been accused of human rights abuses after East Timor's vote for independence from Jakarta in 1999. Around 1,000 people died during the violence, with many deaths blamed on militias linked to the Indonesian army.

  • Court In S Korea To Decide On Roh

The constitutional court in South Korea said it will announce its final ruling on the impeachment of the president, Roh Moo-hyun, in the coming week. The ruling will decide whether to dismiss him or override the impeachment, and restore his suspended executive powers. The opposition controlled National Assembly passed the impeachment motion against President Roh five weeks ago, accusing him of illegal campaigning and corruption. However, he has specifically denied the charges framed against him.

  • Forum Created For World's Child Workers

The first Children's World Congress on child labour opened in Florence. The conference which was organised by trade unions and NGOs - intends to bring together current or former child workers and child activists to exchange ideas and put pressure on governments to combat child labour. The best part of the event is that for the first time, young people will take centre stage speaking about their own experiences and pressing for action to end exploitation and ensure free education for all young people. The International Labour Organisation estimates that 246m children around the world are exploited in full-time work.

  • First Court Martial On Iraq abuse

US forces have announced the first court martial to try a soldier over the Iraqi prisoner abuse scandal. Specialist Jeremy Sivits, a 24-year-old military policeman, will go on trial in Iraq on 19 May. He is the first person for whom a trial date has been set over the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison outside Baghdad.

  • Capital Punishment For Bangladesh Serial Killer

One of the most notorious serial killers in Bangladeshi history has been hanged, and his body will soon be handed over to his family. Ershad Sikder was an influential political figure in the south-western city of Khulna before his arrest five years ago on a murder case. The Bangladeshi president refused to entertain his mercy petition in the Khalid murder case, clearing the way for his hanging. He was a member of both main political parties throughout his criminal career.

  • Editors Cleared In BBC Hutton Inquiry

The BBC has declared that no staff will be sacked following an internal inquiry in the wake of the Hutton affair. The probe was launched after Lord Hutton's inquiry concluded that BBC reporter Andrew Gilligan's report into weapons of mass destruction was "unfounded". The BBC inquiry said the proper process had been in place but was not then followed by Mr Gilligan, who resigned after Lord Hutton's report.

  • Move To Tackle Anti-Social Behaviour

Northern Ireland Government has published plans to introduce measures to protect people from anti-social behaviour. Already operating in England and Wales, Anti-Social Behaviour Orders (ASBOs) are designed to prevent disruptive behaviour by individuals and families who make life difficult for their communities. ASBOs are civil orders rather than criminal penalties, but breaches are punishable by up to five years in prison.

SEBI

Secondary Market Division

  • Frequent Change of Names by Listed Companies

Circular No. SEBI/MRD/Policy/AT/Cir-20/2004 04 Dated 30.04.2004 :It has been decided that all listed companies which decide to change their names shall be required to comply with the following conditions :

1 A time period of atleast 1 year should have elapsed from the last name change

2 Atleast 50% of its total revenue in the preceding 1 year period should have been accounted for by the new activity suggested by the new name

3 The new name along with the old name shall be disclosed through the web sites of the respective stock exchange/s where the company is listed and also through the EDIFAR web site for a continuous period of one year, from the date of the last name change.

Press Release

  • SEBI Signs MOU with Commodity Futures Trading Commission, United States

Press Release No. PR No.95/2004 Dated 29.04.2004 : SEBI signed a MOU with United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in Washington on April 28, 2004. The MOU was signed by Mr. G N Bajpai, Chairman, SEBI and Mr. James E. Newsome, Chairman, CFTC. The MOU aims to strengthen communication channels and establish a framework for assistance and mutual cooperation between the two organizations. The MOU marks the beginning of greater collaboration between SEBI and CFTC to effectively regulate and develop futures markets, in view of greater cross-border trade and cross-market linkages brought about by the globalisation of financial markets.

CBEC Excise Tariff

  • CENVAT Credit Involved on Stock of Light Diesel Oil as on 28.3.2003

Circular No. 784/17/2004/CX Dated 30.04.2004 : The Department has decided to file a SLP in the Supreme Court against the order Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of M/s Grasim Industries Ltd. wherein Circular No. 704/20/2003-CX dated 31.3.2003 has been set aside. In view of the above, show cause notices which are yet to be adjudicated, may be kept pending till the department's SLP is finally decided by the Supreme Court. In other cases, show cause notices may be issued to safeguard revenue but should be kept pending.

  • Treatment of CENVAT Credit Balance at the Year End

Circular No. 783/16/2004/CX Dated 28.04.2004 : It has been brought to the notice of the Board that in certain commodities, where there is accumulated CENVAT credit either due to inverted duty structure i.e. less duty on finished products and more duty on inputs/ raw materials, or due to other reasons, such accumulated/ unutilized credit lying in balance at the end of the financial year is claimed as expenditure and is debited to Profit and Loss account. At the same time, even after claiming the amount as expenditure for Income Tax purposes, the said amount is maintained in the CENVAT credit account which can be subsequently utilized for the purpose of payment of duty on any other finished goods manufactured by the same assessee or for any other purpose in accordance of Central Excise law. As there is no time limit to utilize the balance Cenvat credit and there is no one to one co-relation between the inputs and the finished products, such availment of double benefit may escape notice.

Accordingly, Board has desired that field formations may be sensitized against the unintended dual benefit availed of by certain assessees on account of treatment of unutilized CENVAT credit balance at the year end. In case the CENVAT credit balance has been treated as expenditure in Profit and Loss account and has not been written off in Books of Accounts, the concerned Income Tax authorities should be suitably intimated. The audit parties should also keep this aspect in mind while conducting audit.

CBEC Customs Non Tariff

  • Special Economic Zones (Customs Procedures) (Amendment) Regulations, 2004

Notification No 59/2004-N.T. Dated 30.04.2004 : The amendment has been made in the enforcement date of Special Economic Zones (Customs Procedures) Regulations, 2003. Through amendment the date 11th May, 2004 has been made as the date of enforcement of the said regulations.

  • Special Economic Zones (Amendment) Rules, 2004

Notification No 58/2004-N.T. Dated 30.04.2004 : The amedment has been made in the enforcement date of Special Economic Zones Rules, 2003. Through amendment the date 11th May, 2004 has been made as the date of enforcement of the said rules.

RBI

  • Acquisition of Foreign Securities by Resident Individuals under ESOP Scheme

Circular No. A.P.(DIR Series) Circular No. 90 Dated 03.05.2004 : Earlier a resident individual who is an employee or director of an Indian office or branch of a foreign company in which the foreign holding is not less than 51% is permitted to acquire foreign securities under ESOP Scheme, without any monetary limit, provided the shares under ESOP are offered at a concessional price.

Now as a measure of further liberalisation, it has now been decided to dispense with the condition that the shares should be offered at a concessional price. It has also been decided to permit sale of the shares so acquired, without obtaining prior permission of the Reserve Bank, provided the proceeds thereof are repatriated to India.

  • Guidelines on Compliance with Accounting Standards (AS) by Banks

Circular No. DBOD.NO.BP.BC.82/ 21.04.018/2003-04 Dated 30.04.2004 : Guidelines pertaining to the Accounting Standards, AS 5, AS 9, AS 15, AS 17, AS 18, AS 22, AS 23, AS 25, and AS 27 have already been operationalized. These guidelines were based on the recommendations made by the Working Group constituted under the Chairmanship of Shri N.D.Gupta, former president of ICAI to recommend steps to eliminate/ reduce gaps in compliance by banks with the Accounting Standards issued by the ICAI. The Working Group had also made recommendations in respect of the three Accounting Standards 24, 25 & 26. Now, AS 26 relating to intangible assets has become operational from the accounting period commencing from April 1, 2003. The remaining standards viz. AS 24 and AS 28 have been made effective for the accounting period commencing from April 1, 2004.

RBI considers that with the issue of the guidelines as above and adoption of the prescribed procedures, there should normally be no need for any Statutory Auditor for qualifying balance sheet of the bank being audited for non-compliance with Accounting Standards. Hence, it is essential that both banks and the Statutory Central Auditors adopt the guidelines and procedures prescribed. Whenever specific difference in opinion arises among the auditors, the Statutory Central Auditors would take a final view.

  • Half- yearly Reporting System in Respect of SSI Sick and Non-SSI Sick/Weak Industrial Units

Circular No. IECD. IRD No.11 /06.33.01/2003-04 Dated 27.04.2004 : In terms of the circular IECD. No 24 / 06.01.03 / 92-93 dated March 23, 1993, the banks were required to submit to RBI a statement in form Part III containing the data on qualitative assessment of the performance in rehabilitation of SSI sick and non- SSI sick / weak units, on a half -yearly basis. Now, on a review, it has been decided to discontinue the obtention of the statement with effect from the half year ended March 2004. Accordingly, banks are advised not to forward the captioned statement as on March 31,2004 and onwards.

  • Transactions in Government Securities

Circular No. BPD.SUB. CIR. 5 /09.80.00/2003-04 Dated 28.04.2004 : It has been decided:

a. to permit sale of a government security already contracted for purchase, provided:

(i) the purchase contract is confirmed prior to the sale,

(ii) the purchase contract is guaranteed by CCIL or the security is contracted for purchase from the Reserve Bank and,

(iii) the sale transaction will settle either in the same settlement cycle as the preceding purchase contract, or in a subsequent settlement cycle so that the delivery obligation under the sale contract is met by the securities acquired under the purchase contract (e.g. when a security is purchased on T+0 basis, it can be sold on either T+0 or T+1 basis on the day of the purchase; if however it is purchased on T+1 basis, it can be sold on T+1 basis on the day of purchase or on T+0 or T+1 basis on the next day); and,

b. to shift the settlement of government securities transactions carried out through CCIL to the DVP-III mode so that each security is deliverable/receivable on a net basis for a particular settlement cycle as against the current system of gross settlement of securities under the DVP-II mode.

It has been clarified that so far as purchase of securities from the Reserve Bank through Open Market Operations (OMO) is concerned, no sale transactions should be contracted prior to receiving the confirmation of the deal/advice of allotment from the Reserve Bank. It has been further clarified that the existing special dispensation pertaining to the sale of government securities allotted by the Reserve Bank under the primary auctions will continue to be available.

  • Government of India Announce the Sale Two Dated Securities through Price Based Auctions

Press Release No. 2003-2004/1285 Dated 30.04.2004 : Government of India had announced sale of "Floating Rate Bonds, 2016" (bonds) for an aggregate amount of Rs. 6,000 crore (nominal) by auction using uniform price format. Government of India had also announced the sale (sale (re-issue) of "6.01 percent Government Stock 2028"(stock) for a notified amount of Rs.3,000 crore (nominal) through a price based auction using multiple price auction method. The auctions was conducted by the Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai Office, Fort, Mumbai on Thursday, May 6. 2004.

DGFT

  • Clarification on Import of Approved and Unapproved Drugs under the Advance Licensing Scheme

Circular No. 33 (RE-2004)/2002-2007 Dated 30.04.2004 : In continuation of Policy Circular No. 9(RE-2004)/2002-2007 dated 30.6.2003 and No.15(RE-2004)/2002-2007 dated 17.9.2003. whereby import of approved and unapproved drugs were allowed without the requirements of registration procedure under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act etc., it has been further clarified that the import of bulk drugs in terms of Para 4.2.7 of the EXIM Policy,2002-07 is allowed without the requirement of manufacturing site registration and import licence as required under Ministry of Health Notification No.GSR 604(E) dt. 24.8.2001.

Department of Commerce

  • Anti Dumping Case

Notification No 15/11/2004-DGAD Dated 29.04.2004 : Initiation of mid-term review has been made of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on Lead Acid Batteries originating in or exported from Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong.

Department of Information Technology 
  • Amendments in the IT Certifying Authority Rules

Notification No. GSR285(E) Dated 23.04.2004 : The form for Application for issue of Digital Signature Certificate for the category 'Individual' has been amended. The application form for issue of Digital Signature Certificate for subscriber of Government and Banking Sector shall be "FORM A" and the application form for issue of Digital Signature Certificate for any other subscriber shall be "FORM B". The application form for all other categories of applicants other than 'Individual' shall remain unchanged.

Press Information Bureau
  • 24 FDI Proposals Cleared

Dated 05.05.2004 : Finance Minister, Shri Jaswant Singh has approved 24 Foreign Direct Investment proposals recommended by the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) in its meeting held on April 8, 2004. The approvals amount to around Rs. 204.01 crore. The major investment proposals pertain to the sectors of import and wholesale trading of hi-tech sophisticated machines, infrastructure services including turnkey solutions on water transportation etc. development of integrated township, providing telecommunication services and software development.

  • Justice Rajendra Babu Sworn in as Chief Justice of India

Dated 02.05.2004 : Mr. Justice S. Rajendra Babu was sworn in as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India in solemn ceremony at the Darbar Hall in Rashtrapati Bhavan. The President, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, administered the oath of office to Justice Rajendra Babu. He is the 34th Chief Justice of Independent India.

Supreme Court
  • New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kiran Singh and Ors.

                        with

  • Smt. Kiran Singh and Anr. Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Anr.

In the present case a young Assistant Engineer aged about 27 years had died in a motor accident while travelling in a bus. The said bus was insured with the appellant-company. The claim petition was filed by the wife of the deceased. The Tribunal after considering the evidence and the insurance policy awarded a sum of Rs. 6,25,000/-as compensation payable by the appellant-company along with 12% interest per annum upto date. On appeal, being filed by the appellant, the High Court after hearing both the parties at length maintained the Award granted by the Tribunal but reduced the rate of interest to 9% per annum instead of 12%. Aggrieved thereby, an appeal was preferred by the Insurance Company. The Hon’ble Supreme Court while disposing of the appeal held that “Insurance is a covenant of good faith, where both parties are covenanted to abide by the terms and conditions of the policy. Insurance company must bear in mind that they are the trustee of the public, keeper of the public coffer. Often, even genuine claims are being hotly contested in a routine manner by dragging the parties to courts, wasting enormous time and money for the claimants to get their claims settled. The Act like Motor Vehicles Act being a beneficial legislation aimed at quick redressal of the victims of accident arising out of the use of motor vehicles, the attitude routinely adopted by the insurance company would render the object of the Act frustrated.” Dismissing the appeal the Court held that if such instances were brought to the court, the court would be obliged to dismiss the appeal with heavy costs, apart from deprecating such practices

  • Kusum Ingots and Alloys Ltd. Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Anr.

Whether the seat of the Parliament or the Legislature of a State would be a relevant factor for determining the territorial jurisdiction of a High Court to entertain a writ petition-under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was the question involved in this appeal. The Hon’ble Supreme Court while dealing with the matter observed that “Cause of action implies a right to sue. The material facts which are imperative for the suitor to allege and prove constitutes the cause of action. For every action, there has to be a cause of action, if not, the plaint or the writ petition, as the case may be, shall be rejected summarily.” The Court further observed that the facts pleaded in the writ petition must have a nexus on the basis whereof a prayer can be granted. Those facts which have nothing to do with the prayer made therein cannot be said to give rise to a cause of action which would confer jurisdiction on the court.

It was held by the Hon’ble Court that when a parliamentary legislation receives the assent of the President of India and is published in an Official Gazette, unless specifically excluded, will apply to the entire territory of India. A writ petition, however, questioning the constitutionality of a Parliamentary Act shall not be maintainable in the High Court of Delhi only because the seat of the Union of India is in Delhi. Framing of a statute, statutory rule or issue of an executive order or instruction would not confer jurisdiction upon a court only because of the situs of the office of the maker thereof. Hence, finding no merit in the appeal, the same was dismissed by the Court.

  • Anil Sharma and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Six persons faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 326, 307 read with Section 34, 452 read with Section 34 and 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). Appellant-Anil Sharma was sentenced to death. The others were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC.

The High Court upheld the conviction as recorded by the trial Court but altered the sentence of death imposed on the accused appellant-Anil Sharma to one of life imprisonment. The main contention of the appellant before the Hon;ble Supreme Court was the wrong application of Section 34 of IPC.The Court observed that Section 34 has been enacted on the principle of joint liability in the doing of a criminal act. The Section is only a rule of evidence and does not create a substantive offence. The distinctive feature of the Section is the element of participation in action. The liability of one person for an offence committed by another in the course of criminal act perpetrated by several persons arises under Section 34 if such criminal act is done in furtherance of a common intention of the persons who join in committing the crime. Direct proof of common intention is seldom available and, therefore, such intention can only be inferred from the circumstances appearing from the proved facts of the case and the proved circumstances. In order to bring home the charge of common intention, the prosecution has to establish by evidence, whether direct or circumstantial, that there was plan or meeting of mind of all the accused persons to commit the offence for which they are charged with the aid of Section 34, be it pre-arranged or on the spur of moment; but it must necessarily be before the commission of the crime. The true contents of the Section is that if two or more persons intentionally do an act jointly, the position in law is just the same as if each of them has done it individually by himself. Held, the section has been rightly and properly applied in the case.

High Courts

Delhi

  • J.S. Construction Vs. D.D.A.

The respondent/ DDA challenged the award passed by arbitrator, which was given on the direction of this court to decide again the claims as the arbitrator had not given the reason of the claims and Arbitrator did not call parties for hearing and only justified the amounts already awarded by him.

The Court held that award was remitted back to the Arbitrator as it lacked reasoning but equity demanded that when the Arbitrator was to make decision afresh, he ought to have afforded an opportunity to both the parties to enable them to urge there respective points on the claims.

Madras

  • Thiru. R. Gandhi President, Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India (UOI), rep. by its Secretary, Department of Company Affairs

The Court held that a Judiciary must be free from control by the Executive and Legislature for the independence and impartiality of Judges and a demarcating line must be drawn between judicial and executive/legislative function. The Court further held that the provisions of the appointment, salary structure and tenure of the members of NCLT is defective, and it would be detrimental to competence, dependence and impartiality of the tribunal. Limiting the tenure of members, different salary structure based on substantive post held by members in government service and right of lien in substantive post would affect the independence of judges. The present constitution of NCLT would create the pattern to take over the judicial power by persons who have neither a judicial background nor specialised knowledge of the subject. They would also continue to retain their lien and loyalty to the executive branch and be amenable to the influence of executive superiors and their political masters.

  • Devan Parameswaran Vs. The Union of India (UOI) rep., by its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and Ors.

The petitioner was basically an Indian but acquired Malaysian citizenship as he was born in Malaysia when his father was employed there and he had undergone his education and settled in India. He applied for Indian citizenship to the collector before his visa or the passport had lapsed, but collector did not pursue the matter and the petitioner was prosecuted for crime no. 99 as he stayed in India after expiration of his visa period and remanded to judicial custody. The petitioner applied for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the order and to dispose of the application of citizenship.

The court held that the respondents had wrongly taken action against the petitioner for deportation and prosecution without disposing of the application for citizenship. Court further held that Collector had to forward the application to the appropriate authority for granting citizenship as the Collector is only a forwarding authority after collecting all the necessary particulars and the Collector cannot by himself reject the application. Therefore petitioner could not be blamed for the failure on the part of collector.